Postcrete or Spike: Which One is Best?

Over the last few years, I have placed several posts into the ground. I have become well versed in the ways in which we fix them in, trying out, in equal measures, the use of spikes and postcrete. I can answer the above question, quite quickly, but I want to explain the spike, first. Using a spike is simple and straight forward. You don’t need to dig, or even get dirty. As long as you have a heavy weight, most often a sledgehammer, you can work it into the ground and you’re set for the post. But…there is an issue, they bend out in hard ground. I have found that in the mixed substrate, spikes have turned into bananas, curling around stones and rubbish. I have also had some great success with them, having put up the bike store on the side of the shed with them.

A few set by!

Postcrete is the better option, as it will hold fast and keep the post balanced and upright. The downfall, of course, is that you need to dig a hole. If the ground is hard, you may even need a pickaxe for the job. Once down, though, it’s as simple as placing the post and pouring the postcrete powder in. Sprinkle water into the hole and leave it a while. It works great, and despite the hard work, it is serves for a far better build when creating fences, especially longer ones.

I wouldn’t say that spikes are ‘much’ worse than the postcrete, but I would say that the extra effort will provide a more appreciable outcome. That saying, sometimes, the spike is convenient, and will no doubt continue to be used. I know that I have a few set by.


Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *